{"id":278,"date":"2010-09-02T11:47:21","date_gmt":"2010-09-02T10:47:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.consortium.lu\/?p=278"},"modified":"2010-09-02T12:09:37","modified_gmt":"2010-09-02T11:09:37","slug":"jstor-2nd-interface-update-2-september","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.consortium.lu\/?p=278","title":{"rendered":"JSTOR 2nd interface update. 2 September"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On August 21, 2010, <a href=\"http:\/\/metalib.etat.lu\/V\/?func=native-link&amp;resource=BNL00903\" target=\"_blank\">JSTOR<\/a> released a new interface.\u00a0 One  feature of this new interface, the ability for any user to submit a  search against all JSTOR content, drew strong reactions from many in the  library community.\u00a0 The key concern expressed was that  JSTOR users at participating institutions with a subset of JSTOR  collections could get search results pointing to content they could not  access, and that JSTOR had not yet enabled OpenURL (This service is called &#8220;Find It!&#8221; at Consortium Luxembourg) for all articles,  making it difficult for libraries to use link resolvers to re-direct  users to other copies of the articles that might be available to them.<\/p>\n<p>In response, JSTOR will issue an update to the interface changes released in August. This update is scheduled for tomorrow, Thursday, September 2. Beginning  tomorrow, the default option for authenticated users on all search  forms will be to search licensed content only. Authenticated users  include users on campus or users logged in via a remote access option.  Our reason for taking this step is to reduce any potential frustration  for authenticated users until we can extend support for OpenURL linking  throughout the platform, at which point librarians will be able to  direct their users to alternative options for accessing content not  licensed through JSTOR.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On August 21, 2010, JSTOR released a new interface.\u00a0 One feature of this new interface, the ability for any user to submit a search against all JSTOR content, drew strong reactions from many in the library community.\u00a0 The key concern expressed was that JSTOR users at participating institutions with a subset of JSTOR collections could [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-278","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-new-function"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.consortium.lu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.consortium.lu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.consortium.lu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.consortium.lu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.consortium.lu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=278"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.consortium.lu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":280,"href":"https:\/\/www.consortium.lu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278\/revisions\/280"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.consortium.lu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.consortium.lu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.consortium.lu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}